During the course of a typical day, the graders at Professional Coin
Grading Service (PCGS) examine hundreds of coins - coins that can include
specimens from every denomination, series, size, and coinage metal.
In
each and every case, they bring to bear not only their personal knowledge
but also the collective wisdom gained by PCGS in the course of evaluating
millions of rare coins since 1986. That wisdom has been codified in the
PCGS Coin Grading Standards - a body of guidelines constantly reviewed, studied,
and implemented by members of the grading staff.
Now, for the first time, those standards are being promulgated
publicly in this book so that members of the coin collecting public can
incorporate these carefully formulated guidelines into their own grading
calculations.
Before we consider the grading standards, let's go behind the scenes
at PCGS and look over the shoulder of one of the veteran graders as he goes
about his work.
After coins are received and processed at PCGS, they are brought into
the grading room and distributed in boxes by the grading room manager.
Each box contains only the coins from a particular invoice, and each box is
assigned a unique number. The boxes are generic, and the graders don't
know what types or dates of coins they contain until they examine them.
The grader begins by entering the box number into his computer;
information regarding the first coin in that group then appears on the
screen. The grader takes that coin from the box and carefully removes it
from its plastic flip. He examines the coin, makes a grading
determination, then enters his grade into the computer.
Upon confirmation of this grade in the computer, the next coin listing
appears on the screen and the grader returns the previously graded coin to
its flip. He then removes the next coin from its flip examines and
grades it. The process is repeated until all the coins in the box have
been graded. The grader then enters another box number into the computer
and begins the entire process anew.
Determining the Grade
What thought processes go into combining the elements of a coin and
determining its overall grade? Obviously, the brain makes many
subconscious evaluations before the conscious act of entering the final
grade into the computer. First and foremost, it "measures" the coin's
physical characteristics against those of previously seen coins.
Determining the amount of wear - or lack thereof - is usually the
first element considered by the grader. At the outset, he decides whether
it merits a grade of 60 or above or, on the other hand, a sub-60 grade.
Once he has made this determination, he evaluates the marks, strike, and
luster. The coin's striking status - whether it is a business strike or a
Proof - will have been determined already. Sometimes coins are submitted
as Proofs but are really business strikes, and vice versa. This
determination has to be made before the other elements are considered, as
Proofs and business strikes are evaluated differently. (There is an option
in the computer to "switch" the coin's status, and the grader can do this
when he considers its status to be different from the one listed .)
After reaching a preliminary conclusion, the grader will evaluate more
technical elements such as the planchet's condition and any striking
irregularities, and factor these into the final grade. Before assigning
that final grade, he also will consider any added designations, if these
are applicable. These include a designation of color (RD, RB, or BN) for
copper coins, proof-like or deep-mirror proof-like (PL and DMPL) status for
Morgan silver dollars, full split bands (FB) for Winged Liberty Head
(Mercury) dimes, full head (FH) for Standing Liberty quarters, and cameo
and deep cameo (CAM and DCAM) for post-1950 Proof coins. Finally, the
grader will consider the color or toning, if any, and the eye appeal.
Judgments regarding color or toning are sometimes subjective. When a
coin has beautiful original color or toning, this is almost universally
viewed in a positive way. However, many coins have color or toning that
may be considered differently by different graders. Eye appeal is a
combination of all the other elements of a coin's grade, so there is often
some disagreement on this factor as well. When a coin has blazing luster
and is fully struck with almost no marks, the eye appeal is great and there
is little or no controversy. As with color or toning, however, most coins
don't fall into that category. A grader then makes a partly conscious,
partly subconscious decision on the eye appeal. These factors are then
combined into a final grade.
This is a simplified walk-through of the grading process.
Magnification is often used to examine the subtle nuances of the elements
of grading. Many times, coins have been lightly cleaned, and this affects
their luster and eye appeal. Many coins have been exposed for years to
reactive chemicals and their surfaces may have been affected, depending on
the chemicals, storage procedures, length of exposure, and the coin's
reactive metals. Graders make thousands of subconscious decisions during
the grading process, and their experience and knowledge give them the
insight to make those evaluations accurately.
When all of the graders have finished their evaluations, a coin is
given a final grade. The coin is then encapsulated and verified. If the
verifier disagrees with the final grade, the coin is tagged and given to
the senior graders for discussion and possibly comparison to examples from
the PCGS Grading Set. The Grading Set contains coins that visually
illustrate the PCGS standards, and the entire set is examined by each
grader on a weekly basis. Most of the coins in this set have been there
since 1986, with new specimens being added when especially good examples of
a particular grade are found. Once the senior graders have determined the
final grade, the coin is boxed and sent to the shipping room and returned
to the submitter.
Although grading is a combination of art and science, relatively few
changes are made in the PCGS graders evaluations. More than 95 percent of
the grades they assign are not changed by the verifiers and senior graders.
The graders broad knowledge and the in-depth expertise that many of them
possess in specific areas of numismatics make PCGS consensus grading a very
accurate process.
Note: At times, the following descriptions will include the term "if
applicable." (1) This refers to Proof coins that may not be reflective due
to the method of manufacture. For instance, a Roman- finish Proof or matte
Proof coin will not show reflectivity, but still can grade Proof-68 (or
whatever). It also refers to Proof coins with unusual characteristics,
such as 1889 Liberty Head nickels, 1886 three-cent nickels, and certain
other issues that were minted without highly reflective surfaces. (2) "If
applicable" also can refer to detail left on a coin after wear has taken
place. For instance, detail that is worn away on the eagle's wing is
applicable to the grade of a Morgan dollar, but obviously not to a gold
dollar, since there is no eagle on that coin.