1894-O 50C

1895 50C

1894-S 50C (Regular Strike)

Series: Barber Half Dollars 1892-1915

PCGS MS67

View More Images

PCGS MS66

PCGS #:: 6470

Designer:: Charles E. Barber

Edge:: Reeded

Diameter:: 30.00 millimeters

Weight:: 12.50 grams

Mintage:: 4,048,690

Mint:: San Francisco

Metal:: 90% Silver, 10% Copper

Auction Record:: $27,600 • MS66 • 01-01-2009 • Heritage Auctions

ShowHide Related Coins and Varieties (2)

Major Varieties

1894-S 50C
1894-S 50C, PL

Go To Grade

Price Guide (USD)

PCGS Population

Auctions - PCGS Graded

Auctions - NGC Graded

Current Auctions - PCGS Graded

Current Auctions - NGC Graded

For Sale Now at Collectors Corner - PCGS Graded

For Sale Now at Collectors Corner - NGC Graded

Rarity and Survival Estimates Learn More

Grades	Survival Estimate The Survival Estimate represents an average of one or more experts' opinions as to how many examples survive of a particular coin in three categories: 1) all grades, 2) 60 or better, and 3) 65 or better. These estimates are based on a variety of sources, including population reports, auction appearances, and personal knowledge. Survival estimates include coins that are raw, certified by PCGS, and certified by other grading services.	Numismatic Rarity Numismatic Rarity converts the Survival Estimate for a particular coin into a number from 1 to 10 (with decimal increments) based on the PCGS Rarity Scale. The higher the number, the more rare the coin.	Relative Rarity By Type Relative Rarity By Type ranks the rarity of this coin with all other coins of this Type. Lower numbers indicate rarer coins.	Relative Rarity By Series Relative Rarity By Series ranks the rarity of this coin with all other coins of this Series. Lower numbers indicate rarer coins.
All Grades	3,000	R-4.4	40 / 74 TIE	40 / 74 TIE
60 or Better	300	R-6.4	38 / 74 TIE	38 / 74 TIE
65 or Better	30	R-8.9	9 / 74 TIE	9 / 74 TIE

Survival Estimate
All Grades	3,000
60 or Better	300
65 or Better	30

Numismatic Rarity
All Grades	R-4.4
60 or Better	R-6.4
65 or Better	R-8.9

Relative Rarity By Type All Specs in this Type
All Grades	40 / 74 TIE
60 or Better	38 / 74 TIE
65 or Better	9 / 74 TIE

Relative Rarity By Series All Specs in this Series
All Grades	40 / 74 TIE
60 or Better	38 / 74 TIE
65 or Better	9 / 74 TIE

Condition Census What Is This?

Pos	Grade	Pedigree and History
1	MS67 PCGS grade
2	MS66 PCGS grade	David Akers, sold privately in 8/1995 - Dr. & Mrs. Steven L. Duckor Barber Half Dollar Collection - Heritage 8/2010:3181, $10,925 - Heritage 1/2011:5572 - Eugene H. Gardner Collection, Part III - Heritage 5/2015:98518, $8,812.50 - Heritage 12/2015:3201, not sold - Heritage 2/2016:3247, $7,050
2	MS66 PCGS grade	U.S. Coins - Dale Friend Collection - Heritage 1/2009:3871, $27,600 - Greensboro Collection, Part VI - Heritage 10/2015:3278, $17,625
2	MS66 PCGS grade	San Francisco Mint, sold directly to the following on 11/1894 - John M. Clapp Collection - John H. Clapp Collection, sold intact in 1942 - Louis E. Eliasberg, Sr. Collection - Bowers & Merena 4/1997:2072, $10,450 - John C. Hugon Collection - Heritage 7/2005:10215 - Harry Laibstain, sold privately on 2/10/2006 - Dr. Peter & Janice Shireman Collection - Heritage 1/2016:4102, $7,050
2	MS66 PCGS grade	S. Benton Emery Collection, “undoubtedly acquired directly from the San Francisco Mint in the year of issue” (per Akers) - Bowers & Merena 11/1984:802 - Dr. Thaine B. Price Collection - David Akers 5/1998:132, $25,300
6	MS66 estimated grade
7	MS65 PCGS grade
7	MS65 PCGS grade	Heritage 4/2008:1204, $9,200
7	MS65 PCGS grade
7	MS65 PCGS grade	Dr. Peter Shireman - Heritage 8/2006:5261, $8,625 - Oliver Collection - Heritage 8/2011:7204, $8,625

#1 MS67 PCGS grade

#2 MS66 PCGS grade

David Akers, sold privately in 8/1995 - Dr. & Mrs. Steven L. Duckor Barber Half Dollar Collection - Heritage 8/2010:3181, $10,925 - Heritage 1/2011:5572 - Eugene H. Gardner Collection, Part III - Heritage 5/2015:98518, $8,812.50 - Heritage 12/2015:3201, not sold - Heritage 2/2016:3247, $7,050

#2 MS66 PCGS grade

U.S. Coins - Dale Friend Collection - Heritage 1/2009:3871, $27,600 - Greensboro Collection, Part VI - Heritage 10/2015:3278, $17,625

#2 MS66 PCGS grade

San Francisco Mint, sold directly to the following on 11/1894 - John M. Clapp Collection - John H. Clapp Collection, sold intact in 1942 - Louis E. Eliasberg, Sr. Collection - Bowers & Merena 4/1997:2072, $10,450 - John C. Hugon Collection - Heritage 7/2005:10215 - Harry Laibstain, sold privately on 2/10/2006 - Dr. Peter & Janice Shireman Collection - Heritage 1/2016:4102, $7,050

#2 MS66 PCGS grade

S. Benton Emery Collection, “undoubtedly acquired directly from the San Francisco Mint in the year of issue” (per Akers) - Bowers & Merena 11/1984:802 - Dr. Thaine B. Price Collection - David Akers 5/1998:132, $25,300

#6 MS66 estimated grade

#7 MS65 PCGS grade

Heritage 4/2008:1204, $9,200

#7 MS65 PCGS grade

Dr. Peter Shireman - Heritage 8/2006:5261, $8,625 - Oliver Collection - Heritage 8/2011:7204, $8,625

Ron Guth:

The 1894-S Half Dollar is certainly one of the more intriguing dates in the series. It ranks right up with the best of the dates as a condition-rarity. In terms of the number of Gem examples available, the 1894-S compares favorably with other dates such as 1896-O, 1898-O, 1900-O, 1902-O (is there a pattern developing here?) plus surprising dates such as 1903, 1906, and 1914. The best example is a single PCGS MS67 followed by a small handful of PCGS MS66's. The usual Who's Who of collectors have their names attached to the best examples: Duckor, Price, Shireman, Eliasberg, and Friend. All of the top examples are toned in varying degrees and have superb eye appeal.

David Akers: Despite its considerably higher mintage, the 1894-S is much more rare in Gem condition than the 1894-O, and is actually one of the rarest dates (in Gem) in the entire Barber Half Dollar series. I consider it to be one of the series' most underrated issues since it has never been widely publicized or even recognized as a rarity yet it bears favorable comparison to almost any other issue in the series. The number of Gems in existence is certainly very small...