Survival Estimate | |
---|---|
All Grades | 3,616,000 |
60 or Better | 90,000 |
65 or Better | 8,600 |
Numismatic Rarity | |
---|---|
All Grades | R-1.0 |
60 or Better | R-2.1 |
65 or Better | R-3.2 |
Relative Rarity By Type All Specs in this Type | |
---|---|
All Grades | 35 / 93 TIE |
60 or Better | 80 / 93 TIE |
65 or Better | 34 / 93 TIE |
Relative Rarity By Series All Specs in this Series | |
---|---|
All Grades | 35 / 93 TIE |
60 or Better | 80 / 93 TIE |
65 or Better | 34 / 93 TIE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
#1 MS67 PCGS grade |
Though the mintage of the 1962 is less than one-third that of the 1962-D, the 1962 about twice as common as the 1962-D in Gem condition. The lower mintage 1962 issue was saved while the huge mintage 1962-D was not. And the 1962-D seems to have much more trouble, as do most late D mints, with rough surfaces, i.e. marks and abraisions.